Decisions having diverse ramification
are taken by practically every person on a continual basis. To presume
therefore, that decision-making is a complicated knack is being, to a large
extent, rather bizarre. Research has nonetheless indicated that most people are
a lot weaker at decision-making than they fell about themselves. If the
implications of decision-making are comprehended well, the process per se will
prove effectual.
Meaning
& connotation
There is something called a decision
milieu within the parameters and strictures of which every decision is made. A
decision milieu can be described as an assortment of gathered facts, options,
standards and priorities that are obtainable at the time a decision is taken.
In spite of this, the gathered facts and options are held back on account of
the greater amount of time required for their acquisition and detection
respectively.
The constriction of time suggests that a
decision has to be arrived at within stipulated period of time. On the other
hand, endeavour constriction manifests the restrictions imposed by number of
people involved, financial resources available and precedence set. Since
decisions are to be taken within this limited milieu, it will not be
presumptuous to state that the biggest impediments to decision-making are
ambiguity and insecurity.
It is a foregone conclusion that the
prime objective of decision scrutiny ought to be their lessening. It is a fact
that the factual data required to take a correct decision will never be readily
available, hence all decisions will be plagued with ambiguity and insecurity;
therefore, the peril factor will always be there.
The
influence of quantity
A sound decision can be arrived at with
a specific quantity of information. But people tend to seek and consider more
than the necessary amount. This leads to several problems. The time taken will
be more because of correspondingly more time required to gather and handle the
additional data. Resultantly, the value potential of the decision will reduce.
In addition, information surplus that will set in will lead to several issues
being inadvertently overlooked.
All human beings have limited brain
capacity to handle data, like in the case of different memory configurations of
computers. If information is not synthesized properly, that received first will
always have a tendency to be addressed first. Consequently, mental exhaustion
takes place; information flowing in is disregarded and already available base
is not remembered.
The circumstances can also be described
thus: decisions entail selecting the best one from amongst a series of readily
available ones. The decision almanac, if it may be called so is nothing but a
pool of earlier decisions taken. Interestingly, all previous decisions would
have triggered some options and perhaps brought to a standstill some.
The
importance of decision-making
If one were to go to a readymade
garments store to purchase a shirt, the limitations of choice available posed
by the availability of stocks and brands will always exist. There could well be
scores and scores of brands in the market, but the store would be offering just
a fraction of them. In this situation the decision to select the best shirt
would be hampered by the decision of the shopkeeper to stock only those that he
is displaying. This explains the criticality of the decision-making process.
Decision-making is a very critical
factor in both career selection and progression. It has the potential of
securing or ruining the career prospects of any youth. The career selection
decision has to be very judicious and equally astute. And it is in this context
that ability and penchant tests are conducted; they invariably offer great
advantages in that students recognize their own aptitudes and capabilities.
Resultantly they are able to milk them for career development.
The most significant feature of career
development is its correct selection. It is important because if does not
select his or her career well, the years to follow will always be afflicted by
acute problems, both mental and emotional. In the light of the foregoing, the
need to appreciate and comprehend various causative factors of such impasses
cannot be overemphasized.
The
why of wrong career decisions
There are three prime reasons that make
one to take incorrect career decisions:
· Information
dearth: If adequate
information or data is not available, selecting a correct career can turn out
to be a stumbling block at the very outset itself. The world at large is
relatively unknown to a majority of the youth who reside in small cities. A
very distorted and prejudiced portrait of what is transpiring in the current
era is available to them, as a result the character and coincident eminence of
the career intended to be joined are never discerned by them. Unrealizable
aspirations follow and eventually become a cause of torment.
· Readiness
deficit: There have been
many instances when apt individuals could not continue in good jobs or lost out
on offers because of a disposition of reluctance, disinclination or even
aversion towards them. For example, t is a known fact that very few boys and
girls prefer to work in field or in harsh conditions and cannot ever reconcile
to the idea of doing so. Perks and remunerations hold out no meaning for them.
This readiness deficit could well be inborn or stimulated.
· Impetus debit: In a large number of cases, people have
to be goaded to get work out of them, whether they are adept to do so or not
being of no consequence. This inspiration or enthusiasm turns out to be a very
intense component of career choice and development. People who are introverted
and diffident invariably lose out on being motivated or taking lessons on it.
They, more often than not are ‘my horse also ran’ types.
The decision to select a particular
career has to be necessarily well thought-out. It is out of question to even think of it without
knowing what you are cut out for. If you are not aware of this crucial aspect,
the future will be as uncertain and unstable as ever.
No comments:
Post a Comment